Where the conditions stop being the answer
crimp-gap is one function. Everything below came out of it during this
build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page — so a figure
here is the same figure a reader meets in an essay, and when the generator changes, this
page changes with it.
At its defaults
view: "vertex", slug: "rosette"
view: "vertex", slug: "waterbomb"
view: "degrees", degrees: [4, 6, 8]
What it checked while it drew
Collected by running this generator with a listener on the assertions, not written here. The count is how many separate times this build put that claim to the test.
- a design whose creases run on a 45-degree grid can contain exactly 6 kinds of interior vertex ×4
- at a halved four-crease vertex, 8 assignments pass all four conditions and 6 of them fold ×1
- at a vertex at no particular angles, 16 assignments pass all four conditions and 8 of them fold ×1
- at the preliminary base's centre, 112 assignments pass all four conditions and 112 of them fold ×1
- at the waterbomb tessellation's odd vertex, 30 assignments pass all four conditions and 18 of them fold ×1
- every node of the straight skeleton is equidistant from each edge that defined it, so one fold serves them all — 1 checked ×1
- of the patterns this site prints, 2 carry a vertex the four conditions do not decide ×1
- the four conditions decide a degree-four vertex exactly and over-count at every higher degree tried ×1
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every figure on this list, which is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.
Crimp it away and ask again
Four conditions decide whether a vertex folds flat, and they decide it exactly at a vertex whose sectors are all different sizes. Everywhere else they over-count: two markings of every tied four-crease vertex, twelve of the degree-six vertex this site prints nine of on one sheet. What decides the case is not a fifth condition but a procedure — fold the smallest sector away and ask the smaller vertex.
The whole alphabet of a grid
Box pleating is defended as a trade — give up packing efficiency, buy creases that land where they should. There is a third thing it buys and it is much stronger than either: on a forty-five degree grid there are exactly six kinds of interior vertex a flat-foldable design can contain, ever. On a thirty degree grid there are thirty.
Which vertices are the random ones
Every measurement on this site that begins 'over 373 random degree-four vertices' is a statement about a population nobody declared. There is no canonical way to pick a crease pattern at random, four defensible ways of doing it disagree about the same three questions by factors rather than by margins, and the disagreement reaches a sentence this site has published as though it were general.
Every generator · The flat-folding field · The patterns a reader can fold