What a flat sheet can become — the developable generator
developable is one function. Everything below came out of it during this
build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page — so a figure
here is the same figure a reader meets in an essay, and when the generator changes, this
page changes with it.
At its defaults
sub: "wet-folding"
sub: "curved-crease", radii: [0.34, 0.52, 0.7]
which: [cylinder, cone]
What it checked while it drew
Collected by running this generator with a listener on the assertions, not written here. The count is how many separate times this build put that claim to the test.
- the classification covers 4 surfaces ×4
- a material that stretches 5.0% absorbs the whole excess out to 0.55 radians — 35.1% of the way to the rim — and nothing beyond it ×3
- the broken line's slope rises at every one of its 3 starts, so each start adds tucks rather than taking any away ×3
- a material giving 5.0% needs 7 rings of divisions on a 90° cap, at 0.35, 0.50, 0.62, 0.72, 0.81, 0.90, 0.98 of the way out ×2
- and it does so by 1.4 per cent, which is what the accuracy costs: the pile a start sits in is mostly the start's own three sheets and hardly at all the gathering under it ×2
- and it falls in proportion, so the 20.0% material needs 10 times fewer divisions than the 2.0% one ×2
- and the rings crowd toward the rim — the gaps between them are 0.35, 0.15, 0.12, 0.10, 0.09, 0.09, 0.08, each no wider than the last ×2
- both placements put 4 and 4 starts on a 90° cap, so the two can be compared where they sit ×2
- for every accuracy asked of a 90° cap the best placement needs no more starting radii than even spacing, and fewer once the accuracy is fine — 4 against 3 for 5.0%, 6 against 5 for 2.0%, 8 against 6 for 1.0%, 11 against 9 for 0.5%, 24 against 18 for 0.1% ×2
- the number of divisions falls as the material gives more — 2.0% needs 19, 5.0% needs 8, 10.0% needs 4, 20.0% needs 2 — and the count is the same whether the divisions are gores or tucks ×2
- the placement that follows the sphere best does put its deepest start in more paper — 3.37 sheets against the even placement's 3.32 — because it crowds its starts outward, where the gathering is already thicker ×2
- a gathered hemisphere hides 1 − 2⁄π of its rim, 36.3%, and its rim is π⁄2 sheets thick on average — both exactly ×1
- a gathered hemisphere's rim carries an excess of 1 − 2⁄π = 36.3 per cent of its own circumference, which is the quantity every answer has to dispose of ×1
- a material giving 2.0% needs 18 rings of divisions on a 90° cap, at 0.22, 0.31, 0.39, 0.45, 0.50, 0.55, 0.60, 0.64, 0.68, 0.72, 0.76, 0.79, 0.83, 0.86, 0.90, 0.93, 0.96, 0.99 of the way out ×1
- and the rings crowd toward the rim — the gaps between them are 0.22, 0.09, 0.07, 0.06, 0.05, 0.05, 0.05, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04, 0.03, 0.03, 0.03, 0.03, 0.03, each no wider than the last ×1
- at 16 starts the best spacing's advantage is within three hundredths of its limit on every cap, and on a shallow cap the limit is close to four ninths — 20° 0.468 against 0.450, 45° 0.489 against 0.472, 90° 0.588 against 0.582, 120° 0.675 against 0.666, 150° 0.679 against 0.672 ×1
- each additional gore strictly reduces the residual strain, so the figure's trade is a real one ×1
- every doubling of the starting radii divides the largest shortfall by close to four — 2.14, 1.75, 2.22, 1.77, 2.24 — so the error falls as the square of their number ×1
- every doubling of the starting radii divides the largest shortfall by close to four — 2.99, 3.73, 3.93, 3.98 — so the error falls as the square of their number ×1
- every surface in the classification is one this figure has a verdict for ×1
- for every count of starting radii the best spacing leaves a smaller worst shortfall than even spacing, and at 16 starts the ratio is 0.588, closing on the limit 0.582 that the curvature of a 90° cap sets ×1
- more stretch reaches a deeper cap — 2.0% to 20°, 5.0% to 32°, 10.0% to 45°, 20.0% to 65° — and none of these reaches a hemisphere ×1
- near the centre the hidden length is πs³ ⁄ 3R² to 0.01%, so a tuck that follows the sphere widens as the cube of the distance ×1
- so stretch alone makes no hemisphere at any of these limits, and the cap it does make grows only as the square root of the strain ×1
- the 3 crease radii increase and all lie inside the sheet, so the alternation between them is drawn on paper that exists ×1
- the best 4 starting radii for a 90° cap are closer together the further out they are — stretches of 0.363, 0.235, 0.206, 0.196 of the radius — and leave a worst shortfall of 2.0% against 3.3% evenly spaced ×1
- the cap angle rises monotonically with the strain allowed, which is what the bisection between them depends on ×1
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every figure on this list, which is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.
A crease carries no curvature
A fold looks like the sharpest curvature a sheet could have, and intrinsically it has none at all. Developability — the first of the four conditions this site's checker runs — is exactly the statement that folding an uncut sheet creates no curvature anywhere, including at the creases.
A crease that curves
Bend a crease and the paper either side is forced into a shape nobody creased. The flat-folding theorems say nothing about it, because they are statements about straight creases meeting at a point.
A curve has no panels
A rigid folding is a finite list of flat pieces joined along lines. A curved crease has no such list, and refining one does not help: the kink at each joint falls as one over the segment count, and the total of the kinks does not fall at all, because it is a constant of the curve.
A sheet that grows cannot lie flat
A leaf does not decide to buckle. Growth changes the distances between a sheet's own material points, a set of distances determines a curvature, and a curvature that is not zero cannot be laid in a plane by anything — whatever the sheet is made of and however slowly it grew.
A straight tuck is a cone point
A tuck with straight edges hides length in proportion to how far past its start it has gone, which is a cone's law and not a sphere's. Started at the centre, straight tucks make a cone. Started at several radii, they hide length in a broken line that follows a sphere's cubic, and the worst shortfall falls as the square of the number of starting radii: 36.9 per cent of the rim's hiding from one start, 12.3 from two, 3.3 from four, 0.8 from eight. Every start is three creases at a point, which is a vertex that cannot fold flat — and it is exactly where the gathered sheet's curvature goes.
A tuck keeps what a gore cuts
A flat disc gathered into a spherical cap has more circumference than the cap, and a gore removes the excess while wet-folding stretches it away. A tuck folds it under, which keeps the sheet whole and turns the excess into thickness. At the rim of a gathered cap the paper is α ⁄ sin α sheets thick on average — π⁄2 for a hemisphere — and a simple tuck is three, so single tucks reach a cap of 130.6° before they run into one another. And because a sphere's circles fall short of a plane's as the cube of the radius, a tuck that follows the sphere widens as the cube too: its edges are curves.
Crowd the tucks toward the rim
Straight tucks started at several radii follow a sphere's hidden length in a broken line, and evenly spaced starts leave a worst shortfall that falls as the square of their number. Evenly spaced is not the best spacing. A sphere's hiding bends hardest near the rim, so the best starts crowd outward — on a hemisphere, four of them at 0.36, 0.60 and 0.80 of the radius — and leave 38 per cent less error than four evenly spaced. As the count grows the saving closes on 42 per cent, a limit set by the square root of how the sphere's hiding bends; on a shallow dish it approaches five ninths. To follow a hemisphere within one per cent takes six rings of tucks instead of eight, and within a tenth of a per cent eighteen instead of twenty-four.
Crowding outward costs almost nothing
Placing the tuck starts for equal error crowds them toward the rim, where the gathered paper is already at its thickest, and the obvious worry is that the accuracy is bought with depth. Measured, it is not: on a hemisphere the crowded placement's deepest start sits in 3.37 sheets against the even placement's 3.32, because a start is three sheets of its own and the gathering beneath it is only one and a half.
Paper that stretches on purpose
Wet-folding breaks the assumption every theorem of flat folding rests on, deliberately. It does not repeal the geometry — it buys a few percent of strain, and a few percent of strain is worth about twenty degrees of sphere.
The gap between two curves
The rulings leaving a curved crease are not parallel, so they cross, and the surface exists only as far as the first crossing. That bound is usually read as a limit on how far a design extends outward. It is not: the paper between two curved creases has to be reachable from both, so the bound bites hardest where the circles are smallest, and a concentric pleat has a hole in the middle that no sheet size removes.
The sculptors got there first
Curved-crease folding produced its best objects decades before anybody could compute one. The surfaces were made by hand, the ruling lines that determine them were not calculated until much later, and the mathematics has been catching up ever since.
Three answers, one count
Seams, curved creases and a few per cent of stretch are the three ways round the sphere, and a tuck is a fourth. All four dispose of one quantity — the excess circumference a flat disc has over the sphere's circle — and all four dispose of it by dividing the circle. So the number of divisions needed is the same whichever answer is chosen: nineteen for a hemisphere in a material that gives two per cent, eight at five, four at ten. What differs is what a division costs, and one of the four runs out.
What a flat sheet can become
A sheet that cannot stretch cannot become a sphere. That much belongs to differential geometry; what belongs to folding is the three ways round it — seams, curved creases, and a few percent of stretch — and what each one costs.
What one cut buys
A fold moves paper about and cannot change how much of it surrounds a point. A cut can, and that one difference is the whole of what this site's founding rule is worth. Take a wedge out and the sheet closes into a cone; let one in and it has more paper than the plane will accept.
Where a ring of divisions belongs
A pattern that divides the circle everywhere as finely as its rim requires is over-divided for most of its radius, because the excess grows from nothing. Putting a ring of new divisions in wherever the residual would otherwise pass what the material takes gives seven rings on a hemisphere at five per cent of stretch, at 0.35, 0.50, 0.62, 0.72, 0.81, 0.90 and 0.98 of the way out — and the first of those sits where a completely different criterion put its first tuck start.
Where the rulings run out
A curved fold's surface is made of straight lines leaving the crease, and the lines are not parallel, so they cross. Past the first crossing there is no surface: two points of the paper have been sent to one point of space. The boundary is a curve nobody drew, no crease pattern shows it, and it sits at the sine of the ruling angle times the crease's own tightest radius — on every curve tried.
Every generator · The curves and material field · The patterns a reader can fold