What the order settles, and what it leaves
object-order is one function. Everything below came out of it during this
build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page — so a figure
here is the same figure a reader meets in an essay, and when the generator changes, this
page changes with it.
At its defaults
view: "census", sizes: [3,12, 3,16, 4,12]
view: "census", sizes: [3,12, 4,12]
view: "pair", k: 3, grid: 12
What it checked while it drew
Collected by running this generator with a listener on the assertions, not written here. The count is how many separate times this build put that claim to the test.
- the layer order settles 6 of 16, 12 of 47, 69 of 71 of the ambiguities, and never all of them ×1
- the layer order settles 6 of 16, 69 of 71 of the ambiguities, and never all of them ×1
- two strips creased in different places fold to the same object, band for band and fold for fold, with the layer order given ×1
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every figure on this list, which is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.
The order does not name it either
A photograph of a folded model carries an outline and a layer count, and that is not enough to recover the pattern. Hand the observer the layer order as well — everything the object physically is — and most of the ambiguity goes. Most. What is left are pairs of genuinely different crease patterns that fold to the same object, which no better photograph reaches.
Which side is showing
Two earlier rungs asked what a folded object records about the pattern that made it, first from its outline and then from its complete layer order. Neither observation is one anybody can make. A photograph of duo paper carries the outline, the thickness and the colour showing at every point — and over the whole census the colour separates nothing at all.
Every generator · The flat-folding field · The patterns a reader can fold