Different patterns, one folded object
same-outline is one function. Everything below came out of it during this
build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page — so a figure
here is the same figure a reader meets in an essay, and when the generator changes, this
page changes with it.
At its defaults
k: 4, gsize: 12, view: "pair"
k: 4, gsize: 12, view: "pair", pick: 1
k: 4, gsize: 12, view: "census"
What it checked while it drew
Collected by running this generator with a listener on the assertions, not written here. The count is how many separate times this build put that claim to the test.
- of the 233 folded profiles 4 creases on a grid of 12 can produce, 71 are produced by more than one crease pattern ×3
- the most ambiguous profile is reached by 4 genuinely different patterns, counted up to reading the strip from the other end ×2
- 4 different crease patterns, folded, give the same outline and the same number of layers over every point of it ×1
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every figure on this list, which is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.
The order does not name it either
A photograph of a folded model carries an outline and a layer count, and that is not enough to recover the pattern. Hand the observer the layer order as well — everything the object physically is — and most of the ambiguity goes. Most. What is left are pairs of genuinely different crease patterns that fold to the same object, which no better photograph reaches.
The shadow does not name the pattern
A photograph of a folded model carries an outline and a thickness at every point of it, and that is the whole of what it carries. It is not enough. Crease patterns in genuinely different places fold to identical outlines with identical layer counts, and nearly a third of the folded objects a short strip can reach are reached by more than one pattern.
Which side is showing
Two earlier rungs asked what a folded object records about the pattern that made it, first from its outline and then from its complete layer order. Neither observation is one anybody can make. A photograph of duo paper carries the outline, the thickness and the colour showing at every point — and over the whole census the colour separates nothing at all.
Every generator · The flat-folding field · The patterns a reader can fold