Origami & Folding
what one sheet can do
Series

Exact division — the series

6 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. 3 equal partsestimated by eyethe left-hand divisions are exact — a consequence of the fold, not of carethe right-hand ones are a guess, and the error compoundsvalleymountain

    Dividing without measuring

    A square can be divided into any whole number of equal parts by folding alone — exactly, with no ruler, and with no error to accumulate. The construction is one fold and a theorem nobody expected.

    part 1 · construction
  2. guessoff by 0.16667fold 1off by 0.08333fold 2off by 0.04167fold 3off by 0.02083fold 4off by 0.01042fold 5off by 0.00521fold 6off by 0.00260solid mark — the fold is aiming at 1/3; dashed — at where 1/3 has gonehalving word R L — period 2, from 2^2 − 1 = 3 × 1every fold halves the error exactly, so 6 folds divide it by 64

    Folding a strip into thirds

    A third cannot be constructed by the axioms, so it is not constructed. It is guessed, and then halved into place — an algorithm rather than a construction, with an error that falls by exactly half at every fold.

    part 2 · construction
  3. 1/25 folds to reach 1/5, and every mark on the way is exactthe solid line is the one fold used at every step; the dashed lines are the stepsnothing here converges — each crossing lands on its fraction and stops

    One crossing, and then another

    Folding a strip into thirds by Fujimoto's method halves the error at every fold and never reaches a third. There is a construction that arrives instead: cross the square's diagonal with a line through the mark you already have, and the crossing lands on the next fraction exactly — one fold per step, all the way down.

    part 3 · construction
  4. 4681012141600.10.20.30.40.50.60.7parts the strip is divided intohow far the crease lands out, mmthe exact ladderFujimotothey cross at 4

    Exact is not accurate

    This site has two ways of dividing a strip into equal parts: a ladder that lands on the fraction as a rational number, and Fujimoto's method, which never arrives. Read as mathematics that settles it. Read as instructions for somebody with a sheet of paper it settles nothing, and past four parts the method that never arrives is the one whose crease lands nearer the mark.

    part 4 · construction
  5. the bar is the number of foldings, on a logarithmic scaleboth routes give the number printed; a disagreement anywhere would be a defect in one of them2 × 122 letterings · 1 creases3 × 164 letterings · 2 creases4 × 1168 letterings · 3 creases5 × 15016 letterings · 4 creases6 × 114432 letterings · 5 creases2 × 288 letterings · 4 creases3 × 26032 letterings · 7 creases4 × 2320128 letterings · 10 creases3 × 31,368256 letterings · 12 creasesa strip of stamps is the one-row case, and the classical sequence 2, 6, 16, 50, 144 is the top of the table

    The grid a division makes

    Dividing a square into thirds in both directions is a construction: four creases, each exact, each landing on a rational the ladder can name. The object it leaves behind is a three-by-three map of stamps, and how many ways that folds is the oldest open problem in the subject — 1,368 at three, 300,608 at four, and unknown at five.

    part 5 · construction
  6. guessoff by 0.16667fold 1off by 0.08333fold 2off by 0.04167fold 3off by 0.02083fold 4off by 0.01042fold 5off by 0.00521fold 6off by 0.00260solid mark — the fold is aiming at 1/3; dashed — at where 1/3 has gonehalving word R L — period 2, from 2^2 − 1 = 3 × 1every fold halves the error exactly, so 6 folds divide it by 64

    Dividing a loop into n

    Fujimoto's method divides a strip into any number of equal parts by folding badly and then folding the error in half, over and over. It converges because each step halves what is left over. On a closed loop there is no edge for the leftover to sit against, and what replaces the edge is the loop's own closure.

    part 6 · construction

All series