Self-folding — the series
-
Paper that folds itself
A self-folding sheet has to supply the fold and then choose what to fold into. The second half is where these things fail, and no amount of torque helps, because the two outcomes are equally downhill.
-
One crease decides the sheet
Fix one crease of a flat-folding problem, propagate every condition the subject has, and three creases out of a hundred and fifty-eight follow. Fix one fold angle of a rigid one and every crease on the sheet follows, with a single consistent answer. The same experiment, two questions, opposite answers — and it is why a self-folding sheet needs one biased vertex rather than one per vertex.
-
Which crease to push
Deciding one fold angle settles every other one on a quadrilateral mesh, which is what makes a self-folding sheet buildable with a single actuator. It leaves a question that sounds like an afterthought: which crease. Driving each of a mesh's twenty-four in turn gives twenty-four different answers to how far an error in it travels — and on the sheet that repeats one vertex, it gives several answers to what shape the sheet takes.
-
The hardest instant
Driving one crease of a quadrilateral mesh settles every other one, and an error in the driven crease arrives elsewhere multiplied. That multiplier was measured once, at one fold angle. Followed along the whole motion it is worst at the flat sheet on twenty of twenty-four creases — and on the Miura the measurement has to refuse to answer.
-
Only four creases decide a Miura
Driving one crease of a rigid quadrilateral mesh settles every other one — except that on the pattern everybody builds it often does not. Enumerated properly, four of a four-by-four Miura's twenty-four creases leave exactly one folded state and the other twenty leave two, four or eight. A mesh whose vertices all differ leaves one from every crease. The ambiguity is not a property of quadrilateral meshes; it belongs to the symmetry.
-
Two drivers and one freedom
Two actuators on a sheet with one degree of freedom are two commands for one number, and if they disagree by a hundredth of a radian the sheet cannot satisfy both. Where it settles is decided by the gearing between the two creases: a strongly geared pair absorbs the disagreement and leaves a quarter of it standing, while a weakly geared pair keeps ninety per cent. The loosest coupling is the expensive one, which is the opposite of what coupling usually means.
-
A gearing reflects stiffness squared
Two actuators on a sheet with one freedom disagree, and the sheet settles where their stored energy is least. With unequal stiffnesses the answer depends on them only through k₂g² ⁄ k₁ — the second actuator, seen from the first crease, is a spring of stiffness k₂g², the gearing entering squared as a gear train reflects any stiffness. That settles which actuator to make compliant. On a rigid mesh's loosest pair a second actuator ten times stiffer than the first stores fifty times the fighting energy of one ten times softer, and softening it gives up only 8 per cent of how firmly that crease is held, because the first actuator already holds it ten times over through the gearing. On the tightest pair softening saves four times the energy and gives up 68 per cent of the hold. Compliance is cheap exactly where the fight is expensive.
-
The deciding set does not move
A driven Miura leaves several folded states from most of its creases and exactly one from a few, and those few are where an actuator belongs. It was reported that the few change along the motion — four of twenty-four at 0.6 radians, fourteen at 0.8 — and that a five-by-five sheet had a crease leaving fifteen states where every other count was a power of two. Mapped at twenty angles from 0.1 to 3.0 radians on three sizes of sheet, neither survives. Every crease leaves the same number of states at every angle, every number is a power of two, and the same creases decide the sheet throughout. The changes were the vertex solver losing one of a vertex's two configurations on 138 of 8,640 solves, and the configurations it lost can be carried exactly from an angle where it finds both.