Concept

Gaussian curvature — where it appears

The curvature of a surface that can be computed from its metric alone. Bending without stretching cannot change it, which is why a flat sheet reaches only surfaces where it is zero everywhere.

Named by 13 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

cylinderreachablecurved one way onlyconereachablecurved one way, from a pointsphereunreachablecurved two ways — impossiblesaddleunreachablecurved two ways — impossible

What a flat sheet can become

A sheet that cannot stretch cannot become a sphere. That much belongs to differential geometry; what belongs to folding is the three ways round it — seams, curved creases, and a few percent of stretch — and what each one costs.

material · Developability
00.20.40.60.8100.511.5radius on the flat sheetgrowth factor Ωhow much each ring grew00.20.40.60.81-2-112radius on the flat sheetcurvature Kclosed formthe curvature that forcesgrown more at the rim · K(0) = −4a = -2.40

A sheet that grows cannot lie flat

A leaf does not decide to buckle. Growth changes the distances between a sheet's own material points, a set of distances determines a curvature, and a curvature that is not zero cannot be laid in a plane by anything — whatever the sheet is made of and however slowly it grew.

biology · Growth as metric
a = 0.6K(0) = -2.40opens — a rufflearea ×1.72a = 0.25K(0) = -1.00opens — a rufflearea ×1.27a = 0K(0) = 0.00stays flatarea ×1.00a = -0.25K(0) = 1.00closes — a domearea ×0.77a = -0.4K(0) = 1.60closes — a domearea ×0.65the growth factor is the same function throughout — only the sign of one number changesΩ = 1 + a r² · rim-heavy growth opens the sheet, centre-heavy growth closes it

Which way the disc curves

A growing disc either domes or ruffles, and which one it does is not a matter of how much it grew. It is decided by where the growth was — more at the rim opens the sheet, more at the middle closes it — and one number in one formula takes it through both.

biology · Growth as metric
a crease — concentrated at a pointdeficit 0.5236 rad, all of it hereflat everywhere elsegrowth — spread over the areatotal 0.5236 rad, none of it anywherecurved at every pointa 30° wedge removed, against Ω = 1 − 0.0400 r² · same total curvature, 0.5236

A crease carries no curvature

A fold looks like the sharpest curvature a sheet could have, and intrinsically it has none at all. Developability — the first of the four conditions this site's checker runs — is exactly the statement that folding an uncut sheet creates no curvature anywhere, including at the creases.

biology · Growth as metric
growth profilelargest |K| it carries∫K dAgrown by the same factor everywhereflat — it can be laid in a plane0.0000.0e+0 — nothinggrown more at the rimnot flat at any radius1.400-3.258grown more at the centrenot flat at any radius7.8426.767the growth of a spherical capnot flat at any radius0.3911.118the growth of a hyperbolic discnot flat at any radius0.391-1.360grown so that the curvature cancelsnot flat at any radius1.4004.8e-5 — nothing∫K dA = −2πR (ln Ω)′(R) — the total is decided at the rim, so the interior cancels out of it

The test measures the rim

Flattening the specimen is the right test and the measurement anybody actually makes on a flattened specimen is a boundary one — how far the margin overruns its chord. Total curvature is a boundary quantity too: it equals minus two pi R times the growth profile's slope at the rim, and nothing else about the interior survives into it. So a sheet can be curved everywhere and integrate to nothing, and the test reports it flat.

biology · Growth as metric
00.20.40.60.81-11234radius of the three marks, on the flat sheetmiss against flat (%)grown by the same factor everywhere · −0.00%grown more at the rim · +4.27%the growth of a spherical cap · −1.71%grown so that the curvature cancels · +3.52%a centre mark and three a third of a turn apart · on a flat sheet the three sit √3 times their radius apart

Three marks see nothing

The measurement a rim cannot make is an interior one, and the obvious interior measurement — two marks a known distance apart, measured again after growth — cannot detect curvature at all, because a uniformly enlarged sheet changes that distance and stays flat. Three marks cannot either: any three distances obeying the triangle inequality are the sides of a flat triangle. Four marks give six distances, and six distances are not free on a flat sheet. The growth profile a rim measurement reads as flat misses by three and a half per cent with four marks at the rim.

biology · Growth as metric
00.20.40.60.81-3-2-11radius of the cut, on the flat sheet∫K dA inside the cutR ⁄ √2grown by the same factor everywheregrown more at the rimthe growth of a spherical capgrown so that the curvature cancelsa cut at radius r reads the total curvature of the disc inside it, −2πr (ln Ω)′(r) — the rim measurement moved inward

A cut reads a slope

A rim measurement returns one number for a whole grown disc, and a family of growth patterns share it. Cut the disc in a circle and the piece inside has a rim of its own, and its reading is minus two pi r times the slope of the log of the growth at the cut — so a cut reads a slope, a set of cuts reads the slope at each radius, and the slopes add up to the growth profile itself. The one thing no cut can recover is how much the whole sheet was enlarged, which is the one kind of growth that curves nothing.

biology · Growth as metric
curved tucksthe disc is the flat sheet; the dark lines fold each tuck under, the light line folds it in half8 curved tucks, a cap of 90°hidden at the rim: 36.3%rim thickness on average: 1.571 sheetsthe tuck widens as the cube of the radius

A tuck keeps what a gore cuts

A flat disc gathered into a spherical cap has more circumference than the cap, and a gore removes the excess while wet-folding stretches it away. A tuck folds it under, which keeps the sheet whole and turns the excess into thickness. At the rim of a gathered cap the paper is α ⁄ sin α sheets thick on average — π⁄2 for a hemisphere — and a simple tuck is three, so single tucks reach a cap of 130.6° before they run into one another. And because a sphere's circles fall short of a plane's as the cube of the radius, a tuck that follows the sphere widens as the cube too: its edges are curves.

material · Developability
the bar is the worst gap between the hiding straight tucks do and the hiding a sphere needsa cap of 90°, as a share of what the rim hides — every tuck straight, started at evenly spaced radiifrom 1 radius36.9%straight from the centrefrom 2 radii12.3%2.99 times smaller than 1from 4 radii3.3%3.73 times smaller than 2from 8 radii0.8%3.93 times smaller than 4from 16 radii0.2%3.98 times smaller than 8a broken line through a smooth curve is out by the curvature times the square of the spacing

A straight tuck is a cone point

A tuck with straight edges hides length in proportion to how far past its start it has gone, which is a cone's law and not a sphere's. Started at the centre, straight tucks make a cone. Started at several radii, they hide length in a broken line that follows a sphere's cubic, and the worst shortfall falls as the square of the number of starting radii: 36.9 per cent of the rim's hiding from one start, 12.3 from two, 3.3 from four, 0.8 from eight. Every start is three creases at a point, which is a vertex that cannot fold flat — and it is exactly where the gathered sheet's curvature goes.

material · Developability
the bar is the worst shortfall in hidden length, as a share of what the rim hidesa cap of 90°, straight tucks started at evenly spaced radii and at the best radii for the same count2 starts, evenly spaced12.3%2 starts, best spaced8.5%31% smaller3 starts, evenly spaced5.8%3 starts, best spaced3.7%36% smaller4 starts, evenly spaced3.3%4 starts, best spaced2.0%38% smaller8 starts, evenly spaced0.8%8 starts, best spaced0.5%40% smaller16 starts, evenly spaced0.2%16 starts, best spaced0.1%41% smallerthe best radii give every stretch between starts the same worst error, which crowds them toward the rim

Crowd the tucks toward the rim

Straight tucks started at several radii follow a sphere's hidden length in a broken line, and evenly spaced starts leave a worst shortfall that falls as the square of their number. Evenly spaced is not the best spacing. A sphere's hiding bends hardest near the rim, so the best starts crowd outward — on a hemisphere, four of them at 0.36, 0.60 and 0.80 of the radius — and leave 38 per cent less error than four evenly spaced. As the count grows the saving closes on 42 per cent, a limit set by the square root of how the sphere's hiding bends; on a shallow dish it approaches five ninths. To follow a hemisphere within one per cent takes six rings of tucks instead of eight, and within a tenth of a per cent eighteen instead of twenty-four.

material · Developability
accuracy against thicknessthe pile at a start is the gathering's own mean layers there plus the two a tuck addsplacementstarts atdeepest pilemean pileevenly spaced0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.803.323.14placed for equal error0.31, 0.51, 0.68, 0.843.373.19a start is three sheets where it sits, over a gathering already 1.57 sheets thick at the rim

Crowding outward costs almost nothing

Placing the tuck starts for equal error crowds them toward the rim, where the gathered paper is already at its thickest, and the obvious worry is that the accuracy is bought with depth. Measured, it is not: on a hemisphere the crowded placement's deepest start sits in 3.37 sheets against the even placement's 3.32, because a start is three sheets of its own and the gathering beneath it is only one and a half.

material · Developability
the same arithmetic three waysm divisions leave a residual of f ⁄ m inside each piece, whatever the divisions are made ofthe material givesdivisions neededas goresas tucksas curved creases2.0%1919 cuts, 59.7 of seam19 tucks, 3 sheets deep19 creases, no cut and no pile5.0%88 cuts, 25.1 of seam8 tucks, 3 sheets deep8 creases, no cut and no pile10.0%44 cuts, 12.6 of seam4 tucks, 3 sheets deep4 creases, no cut and no pile20.0%22 cuts, 6.28 of seam2 tucks, 3 sheets deep2 creases, no cut and no pilecap of 90°, rim excess 36.3% · the count is ⌈f ⁄ ε⌉ in every column; only the cost of a division changes

Three answers, one count

Seams, curved creases and a few per cent of stretch are the three ways round the sphere, and a tuck is a fourth. All four dispose of one quantity — the excess circumference a flat disc has over the sphere's circle — and all four dispose of it by dividing the circle. So the number of divisions needed is the same whichever answer is chosen: nineteen for a hemisphere in a material that gives two per cent, eight at five, four at ten. What differs is what a division costs, and one of the four runs out.

material · Developability
00.20.40.60.811.21.41.600.10.20.30.4arc from the pole (radians)excess, as a share of the circle7 rings5.0% stretchfirst at 0.35last at 0.98of the way to the rima ring goes in wherever the residual excess would otherwise pass what the material takes

Where a ring of divisions belongs

A pattern that divides the circle everywhere as finely as its rim requires is over-divided for most of its radius, because the excess grows from nothing. Putting a ring of new divisions in wherever the residual would otherwise pass what the material takes gives seven rings on a hemisphere at five per cent of stretch, at 0.35, 0.50, 0.62, 0.72, 0.81, 0.90 and 0.98 of the way out — and the first of those sits where a completely different criterion put its first tuck start.

material · Developability

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Developable surfacePleatDifferential growthGrowthMetricAngle deficitGoreDevelopabilityIsometryLayer countConeMeasurement

All concepts