Reduction — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The gadgets that make it hard
Flat-foldability is NP-hard, and the proof is a construction rather than an obstruction: a machine for turning any satisfiability problem into a sheet of paper that folds exactly when the problem has an answer.
Hardness is about the worst one
Flat-foldability is NP-hard, and every crease pattern on this site is decided in under a second. Both are true, and holding them together is the difference between using the result and repeating it: hardness is a statement about the worst instance a family contains, and nobody folds the worst one.
What universality costs
The fold-and-cut theorem says any straight-line drawing can be flattened onto a single line. It says nothing about how much crease pattern that takes, and the amount is a measurable quantity — computed here by running the construction rather than by estimating it.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
The Bern–Hayes reductionNP-hardAssignmentCompletenessDecidabilityThe decision problemThe fold-and-cut theoremLayer orderingThe machine modelOutput-sensitive costStraight skeletonThe taco-taco condition