The same error, three directions
error-direction is one function. Everything below was drawn by it when the site was
last published, at settings taken from the essays rather than invented for this page — so a figure
here is the same figure a reader meets in an essay, and when the generator changes, this
page changes with it.
With nothing specified
view: "cost", seed: 11, rho: 0.6, mm: 150
view: "space", seed: 11, rho: 0.6
view: "space", seed: 23, rho: 0.6
What it checked while it drew
Collected while it drew, not written by hand. The count is how many separate times that claim was put to the test.
- the four-by-four mesh at seed 11 folds rigidly, so the errors measured below are steps away from a solution that exists rather than from a target nothing reaches ×2
- the solution set has 16 directions the closure does not see and 4 it does, counted from the derivative rather than assumed ×1
Where it is called
Every figure listed here is drawn by the same rule, so a mistake in the rule would be in all of them at once, and so would a correction.
A tolerance is a direction
Cut a solved mesh a fifth of a millimetre wrong and its closure is gone. That is true of the errors it was tried with and false of errors in general: the solutions form a surface sixteen directions wide, an error along it costs five thousand times less than the same error across it, and the fifth of a millimetre is the allowance in one direction out of twenty.
The allowance is spent at the end
A tolerance on a solved mesh was priced at one fold angle, because that is where a tolerance is priced. The surface of solutions turns out not to move as the sheet folds — the free directions at a third of a radian are the free directions at two and a half, to twelve figures — and the price of leaving it rises by a factor of thirteen along the way.
All the figures · The rigid folding field · The patterns a reader can fold