Closing and being solid are two conditions
mesh-collision is one function. Everything below was drawn by it when the site was
last published, at settings taken from the essays rather than invented for this page — so a figure
here is the same figure a reader meets in an essay, and when the generator changes, this
page changes with it.
With nothing specified
view: "survey", steps: 20
view: "survey", seeds: [11, 17, 19, 23, 27, 71], steps: 20
view: "sweep", seeds: [11, 17], from: 0.08, to: 2.7, steps: 24
What it checked while it drew
Collected while it drew, not written by hand. The count is how many separate times that claim was put to the test.
- the solved meshes: of 6 meshes whose every loop closes to within a millionth of a radian, 1 drives one panel through another — and the pair that crosses is 2 steps apart in the sheet, so no condition evaluated at a vertex could have seen it ×3
- the solved meshes: the other 5 are solid at every angle sampled, so closing and being buildable are two conditions rather than one ×3
- the motion is followed one branch at a time rather than solved at each angle independently, so a jump in the picture would be a refusal rather than a curve ×1
Where it is called
Every figure listed here is drawn by the same rule, so a mistake in the rule would be in all of them at once, and so would a correction.
A collision is an order
Paper passing through paper is treated here as a thing that happens during a motion and is caught by watching for it. At the flat state it is not an event at all: it is the absence of an ordering, and it can be proved rather than observed. Four of the six quadrilateral meshes this site solves for rigid folding place perfectly and admit no ordering of their nine panels — so every one of them must pass through itself, and none of them was ever driven to find out.
Closing is not building
A quadrilateral mesh solved so that every loop closes to within a millionth of a radian is a mesh whose fold angles are consistent. It is not necessarily an object. One of the six solved here drives a panel through another at every angle of its motion — there is no part of the fold at which it could be made of solid panels — and the pair that crosses is two steps apart in the sheet, where nothing evaluated at a vertex could see it.
Refused at one lettering
Four of six quadrilateral meshes here have no arrangement of their nine panels — established by searching every ordering, at the labelling each mesh arrived with. Enumerate every labelling instead and two of the four fold perfectly well at a different one. What was reported as a fact about four meshes is a fact about two meshes and two labellings.
All the figures · The rigid folding field · The patterns a reader can fold