Inscribed polygon — where it appears
Named by 7 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The largest triangle in a square
The biggest equilateral triangle a square sheet holds is tilted by exactly fifteen degrees and uses 46.4% of the paper. Both numbers come out of a quadratic — which means a compass reaches this optimum too, and folding's advantage is not needed here at all.
The biggest one that can also be folded
Which regular polygon uses a square sheet best, and which of them a fold can actually construct, are two questions with completely different pedigrees. Answered side by side over sixteen polygons, they turn out to agree — and the reason is that both are questions about the arithmetic of the same number.
The square is in the answer
The largest regular polygon a square sheet holds is not increasing in the number of sides, and the octagon's win is the striking part: it uses 82.8% of the paper against the twelve-gon's 80.4% and the hexagon's 69.6%. Run the same census over rectangles and the octagon's advantage is gone — on every proportion tried the hexagon leads, and the order among the even-sided polygons reverses outright.
Every even polygon beats every odd one
Crossed with what each tool can build, the census of the largest regular polygon a sheet holds gives the same verdict on every proportion from a square to three to one: the best polygon is one a compass already builds, and the best polygon only a fold can build places fourth at best. The ranking itself stops moving at a proportion of 1.1284, where the hexagon overtakes the octagon. On every longer sheet only the short side holds a polygon, each polygon's share is a fixed constant divided by the length, and the constant — its area over the square of its least width — comes down to the circle's π⁄4 for even polygons and climbs up to it for odd ones. So every even polygon beats every odd one.
The crossing is as hard as the polygon
Lengthen a square sheet and the largest hexagon it holds turns, pressed against all four edges, until it overtakes the polygons held by the short side alone. Every one of those overtakings happens at a proportion with a closed form, √3⁄2 + ½√(8K⁄3√3 − 1), and the number that comes out is exactly as hard to mark as the polygon being overtaken is to build. The octagon's 1.1284 is a compass number of degree eight. The heptagon's 1.0696 has degree twenty-four and needs a fold. The hendecagon's 1.0853 has degree forty and needs two folds at once.
The sheet a polygon fits exactly
A regular polygon with 4k + 2 sides has flat edges along one axis and corners along the other, so there is one sheet, 1⁄cos(π⁄n) long, that it touches on all four edges at once. On that sheet it is beaten only by the multiples of four with fewer sides, and so it ranks exactly (n − 2)⁄4. That puts the fourteen-gon, which only a fold builds, third rather than fourth; the twenty-two-gon, which needs two folds at once, fifth rather than ninth; and the forty-six-gon, beyond two folds, eleventh. Seven sheets from a square to three to one had missed all three.
Turning is uphill all the way
A regular polygon of 4k + 2 sides on a sheet a little longer than a square cannot lie flat: it turns, pressed against all four edges, until the sheet is exactly its own. Its share on the way has a closed form, and the closed form's slope is proportional to h² − 1 for every such polygon — flat on the square, rising all the way to the own sheet, and falling after it. So the own sheet is exactly the peak, the gain from the square to it is the average of one and the sheet's length, and the rank the census measured for polygons of this kind, (n − 2)⁄4, is now a theorem.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
ConstructibilityOptimalitySheet shapeTotientPierpont primesRotational symmetrySupport widthSymmetryAxiomConstructible numberField extensionPaper proportion