Generator

What each corrugation costs

A generator in the tessellations library, called 14 times across 6 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults and at the arguments the essays give it, what it checked while drawing, and everywhere it is used.

shrink-census is one function. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page — so a figure here is the same figure a reader meets in an essay, and when the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

What each corrugation costsHow much smaller each pattern folds and how many layers deep it gets doing it, both measured off the folded state. The last column is the two multiplied together against the sheet they came from, and it is one everywhere, because the paper has nowhere else to be.patternhow much smaller it foldscreasingper sheet-widthpreliminary8.0 layers, 8 at the deepest8.0×4.81.65×footprint × depth = 1.004 of the sheetmiura8.1 layers, 16 at the deepest8.1×6.21.31×footprint × depth = 1.001 of the sheetyoshimura32.0 layers, 36 at the deepest32.0×11.82.71×footprint × depth = 1.000 of the sheetwaterbomb31.6 layers, 32 at the deepest31.8×14.32.22×footprint × depth = 0.992 of the sheettwist3.0 layers, 9 at the deepest3.0×4.70.64×footprint × depth = 0.995 of the sheetthe shrinkage is the pattern's, not the paper's — nothing here knows what the sheet is made of

which: [preliminary, miura, leaf, twist], samples: 200, cols: 5, rows: 4

What each corrugation costsHow much smaller each pattern folds and how many layers deep it gets doing it, both measured off the folded state. The last column is the two multiplied together against the sheet they came from, and it is one everywhere, because the paper has nowhere else to be.patternhow much smaller it foldscreasingper sheet-widthpreliminary8.0 layers, 8 at the deepest8.0×4.81.65×footprint × depth = 1.004 of the sheetmiura8.7 layers, 16 at the deepest8.7×7.21.22×footprint × depth = 1.000 of the sheetleaf8.3 layers, 16 at the deepest8.3×9.00.93×footprint × depth = 1.000 of the sheettwist3.0 layers, 9 at the deepest3.0×4.70.64×footprint × depth = 0.995 of the sheetthe shrinkage is the pattern's, not the paper's — nothing here knows what the sheet is made of

sub: "packing-ratio", s: 0.42

What folding buysThe footprint of a Miura-folded sheet as it closes, against its flat area. The two in-plane dimensions shrink together rather than trading against each other, which is what a negative Poisson's ratio means and why the pattern packs so well.00.20.40.60.8100.20.40.60.81how far the sheet is closedfraction of the flat sheetfootprintwidthlengthboth dimensionscontract together,so the area fallsfaster than either

which: [preliminary, miura, yoshimura, waterbomb, twist], samples: 200

What each corrugation costsHow much smaller each pattern folds and how many layers deep it gets doing it, both measured off the folded state. The last column is the two multiplied together against the sheet they came from, and it is one everywhere, because the paper has nowhere else to be.patternhow much smaller it foldscreasingper sheet-widthpreliminary8.0 layers, 8 at the deepest8.0×4.81.65×footprint × depth = 1.004 of the sheetmiura8.1 layers, 16 at the deepest8.1×6.21.31×footprint × depth = 1.001 of the sheetyoshimura32.0 layers, 36 at the deepest32.0×11.82.71×footprint × depth = 1.000 of the sheetwaterbomb31.6 layers, 32 at the deepest31.8×14.32.22×footprint × depth = 0.992 of the sheettwist3.0 layers, 9 at the deepest3.0×4.70.64×footprint × depth = 0.995 of the sheetthe shrinkage is the pattern's, not the paper's — nothing here knows what the sheet is made of

What it checked while it drew

Collected by running this generator with a listener on the assertions, not written here. The count is how many separate times this build put that claim to the test.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list, which is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

A shrink is two numbers

How much smaller a folded sheet gets is quoted as a single factor, and that factor is a product. Measured along each axis separately, an accordion turns out to leave one direction of the paper exactly alone, a twist draws in equally both ways, and the Miura does neither — which is the whole of what makes it a Miura.

Found before it was designed

Crush a thin cylinder and it falls into a diamond lattice. That pattern was published in aeronautics in 1951, twenty years before anybody designed with it — and what the buckling load chose was not only the creases but the mountain-and-valley assignment, which is the part a designer gets wrong.

Four ways to draw a pattern

Every sentence here of the form over some crease patterns is a statement about a construction nobody declared, and it is worse than the same problem at a vertex because a pattern has a shape as well as angles. Four ways of producing a pattern that satisfies every condition disagree about how far it shrinks by a factor of twelve, about how much creasing it costs by a factor of six, and about how much of it is edge by a factor of two.

The paper is all still there

A folded sheet is smaller than it was and none of it has gone anywhere. How much smaller it is and how many layers deep it is are not two properties of a pattern — they are one number, and their product is the sheet.

What a corrugation costs

Every tessellation this repository can fold, measured the same way: how much smaller it gets, how deep the stack becomes, and how much creasing was needed to buy it. The last column is the one nobody quotes and the one a folder feels.

Where two twists share a pleat

Every twist tessellation the tradition draws has one size of twist, because every tiling it is drawn on has one kind of vertex. Hand the construction a tiling with two, and the pleat between a large twist and a small one turns out to fix their sizes exactly — three to one, and nothing else folds.

Every generator · The tessellations field · The patterns a reader can fold