Inverse problem — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as profile — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
The order does not name it either
A photograph of a folded model carries an outline and a layer count, and that is not enough to recover the pattern. Hand the observer the layer order as well — everything the object physically is — and most of the ambiguity goes. Most. What is left are pairs of genuinely different crease patterns that fold to the same object, which no better photograph reaches.
Which side is showing
Two earlier rungs asked what a folded object records about the pattern that made it, first from its outline and then from its complete layer order. Neither observation is one anybody can make. A photograph of duo paper carries the outline, the thickness and the colour showing at every point — and over the whole census the colour separates nothing at all.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
ProfileDuo paperEvidenceFolded stateIdentifiabilityLayer orderLayer orderingStackingTwo-colourability