Concept

Rigid-foldability — where it appears

The property that a crease pattern can be folded with flat, undeformable panels. Almost no pattern that folds flat in paper has it, and for a quadrilateral mesh it is a condition on a loop of faces rather than on any vertex.

Named by 10 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

the pattern as it isevery edge keeps its length6.7e-16the same pattern, moved by 0.01and one of them cannot1.7e-21e-181e-161e-141e-121e-101e-81e-61e-41e-21largest change in any edge length, in panel widthswhat an isometry has to do, and what it manages5 × 4 panels, at 50% folded, every edge of both comparedthe moved pattern is fitted the best single panel its own edge lengths allow before being folded at allso the gap is not a bad choice of panel — it is what is left when the best choice has been made

Panels instead of paper

Flat-foldability asks whether a pattern can reach a flat state. Rigid-foldability asks whether it can get there without any face bending on the way. The second is much stronger, and everything that gets manufactured lives inside it.

rigid · Rigid folding
60° / 90°all 4 reached30° / 120°all 4 reached45° / 45°2 of 8 reached50° / 70°all 4 reached80° / 55°all 4 reachedsectorseach square is one assignment the theorems allowfilled — a rigid motion arrives there · open — a flat state with no path to itthe gap opens where two sectors are equal, and nowhere else on this listbig-little-big has nothing to forbid there — the linkage still does

A state no motion reaches

Flat-foldability asks whether a folded state exists. Rigid-foldability asks whether there is a path to it. The two sets are different, and the difference can be counted on a single vertex.

rigid · Rigid folding
1.7e-6 at 1e-61e-61e-51e-41e-31e-21e-61e-51e-41e-31e-2how far each vertex of the flat pattern was moved, in panel widthslargest edge-length errorfitted slope0.9999over four decadesat a displacement ofexactly zero the erroris 6.7e-16, which iswhere the arithmeticstops and not wherethe geometry does5 × 4 panels at 50% folded, with one set of displacement directions scaled across the decadesa slope of one is the claim: the failure is first order, so no displacement is small enough to be free

The only pattern that moves

A rigid motion is not a generic property of a folded pattern. Move one vertex of a Miura by a thousandth of a panel and the sheet has no isometric folded position of that kind at all — and the amount by which it fails is first order in the displacement, so no move is small enough to be free.

rigid · Rigid folding
parallel columnsKawasaki to 3e-14°columns fanning by 5.2°Kawasaki to 5e-14°columns fanning by 9.2°Kawasaki to 5e-14°the mountain-and-valley letters are read off the motion rather than drawn, and then put past Maekawa

The family the Miura belongs to

Move one vertex of a Miura and the sheet has no rigid folded position at all — which leaves the obvious question unanswered. What else moves? A row of paper reflected in each of a fan of lines is flat-foldable for nothing at all, and whether it also folds rigidly turns out to be a condition on a table of cosines: it has to be a column of numbers times a row of numbers.

rigid · Rigid folding
the ratio of each column's cosine to the first column'scol 1col 2col 3col 4col 5the sheet that folds1.0000-1.08221.0000-1.08221.00001.0000-1.08221.0000-1.08221.00001.0000-1.08221.0000-1.08221.0000row 1row 2row 3one row moved by 14 per cent1.0000-1.08221.0000-1.08221.00001.0000-1.13971.0000-1.13971.00001.0000-1.08221.0000-1.08221.0000row 1row 2row 3worst disagreement between rows: 4e-16 before, 0.0575 after

Where an error goes

A misplaced crease in a folded sheet has to be paid for somewhere, and this subject has two answers already — the error is folded too, and the hinge is where it ends up. There is a third. In a quadrilateral mesh a mistake in one row has no consequence in that row at all: it is felt by the columns, which is to say by every other row on the sheet.

rigid · Tolerance
flat-foldable at every vertex, all threeworst Kawasaki residual 0e+0 radiansone vertex moved -30 per centloop residual 2.4e-1the Miuraloop residual 5.8e-14one vertex moved 40 per centloop residual 3.6e-1every one of these is developable and flat-foldable at every interior vertex, exactly

The condition that is not flat-foldability

Take away the assumption that one crease family runs straight through every vertex and ask what makes a quadrilateral mesh move. It is not flat-foldability. There is a one-parameter family of meshes, every one of them developable and flat-foldable at every vertex to machine precision, and exactly one member of it folds — the Miura. Slide a single vertex along the ray that keeps every condition exact and the sheet stops moving, first order in the displacement.

rigid · Rigid folding
the bar is the share of the population with a folded stateevery pattern in all four passes every condition at every interior vertexthe printed patterns4 of 80 cannot be placed · 0 cannot be ordered · 4 undecidedtwist tessellations2 of 125 cannot be placed · 2 cannot be ordered · 3 undecidedquadrilateral meshes2 of 60 cannot be placed · 4 cannot be ordered · 0 undecidedfold-and-cut patterns5 of 70 cannot be placed · 0 cannot be ordered · 2 undecidedundecided is a real answer here and is not rounded toward either side

A collision is an order

Paper passing through paper is treated here as a thing that happens during a motion and is caught by watching for it. At the flat state it is not an event at all: it is the absence of an ordering, and it can be proved rather than observed. Four of the six quadrilateral meshes this site solves for rigid folding place perfectly and admit no ordering of their nine panels — so every one of them must pass through itself, and none of them was ever driven to find out.

rigid · Self-contact
the bar is sheet-widths of crease per layer of compactionshorter is a better exchange rate, and the order is nothing like the order aboveThe Yoshimura pattern0.2314.0 of crease · 60.0 layersThe waterbomb tessellation0.4514.3 of crease · 31.5 layersThe preliminary base0.604.8 of crease · 8.0 layersThe Miura fold0.676.2 of crease · 9.2 layersThe tapered corrugation0.796.6 of crease · 8.3 layersFold and cut — the triangle1.451.7 of crease · 1.2 layersThe square twist1.564.7 of crease · 3.0 layersThe hexagon twist1.886.1 of crease · 3.3 layersa corrugation pays less per layer than a base does, and the difference is not small

Fourth of eight, and still not chosen for it

A deployable is sold on compaction: large in use, small in transit. Measured, the pattern that actually gets built converts folding into compaction at 0.67 sheet-widths of crease per layer, which is fourth of the eight printed patterns — nearly three times worse than the Yoshimura, which nobody deploys, and nearly three times better than the hexagon twist, which nobody deploys either. The ranking does not pick out the pattern that flew from anywhere on the shelf, and that is the finding.

rigid · Deployables
the sectors are 40°, 140°, 40°, 140° — each row is one way the vertex can start to foldcrease 1crease 2crease 3crease 4mode 10.7100.7102 of the four creases movemode 200.7100.712 of the four creases movethe numbers are the four fold angles' ratios to one another as the vertex leaves the flat state

Two mechanisms at one point

Two creases drawn across each other cannot fold flat — Maekawa's count refuses them at every angle. They move perfectly well as rigid panels, and they move in two ways: bend along one line while the other stays flat, or the reverse. Every other developable vertex of degree four has two ways too, and in both of them all four creases move together at a fixed ratio. The crossing is the case where the two motions have nothing to do with each other.

rigid · Rigid folding
the period cell of the Miuraone period, with its neighbours round it2 interior vertices in the cell7 crease pieces drawnperiod 1.000 × 2.000one column wide and two rows high, because the zigzag returns after twothe cell is a rectangle of ordinary paper until somebody says its edges are one edge

A mechanism that closes on itself

A rigid-foldable pattern is a mechanism: panels as rigid plates, creases as hinges, and a motion counted by degrees of freedom at each vertex. Close the sheet into a tube and the mechanism has to come back to itself after a circuit — a constraint that is not at any vertex and that the degree-of-freedom count does not see.

rigid · Rigid folding

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Fold angleClosureDegrees of freedomKawasaki's theoremKinematicsMiura-oriSpherical linkageDegree-fourMechanismQuadrilateral meshRigid foldingAnisotropy

All concepts