Shrinkage — where it appears
Named by 11 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The dial that decides nothing
Turn a twist tessellation's angle from one fence to the other and every measurable thing about it changes: the smallest sector goes from 88 degrees to under one, the pleats swallow a quarter of the sheet and then almost none of it, the folded footprint changes by a third. The number of ways it can be creased does not change at all — sixteen, at every angle tested — because the lemma reads which sector is smallest and never how small.
Folding it flat is one similarity
Where a cell of paper goes when a twist tessellation collapses is a scale and a turn: multiply the plane's lattice by 0.410373441 and rotate it by 36.62°. That is the answer on the square grid, the triangular grid, the honeycomb, the elongated triangular tiling and the rhombille alike, agreeing to eight figures — while the collection's other answer to how much smaller it gets gives those five tilings five different numbers.
The turn a column costs
The Yoshimura's drawing repeats every column. Folded flat, it does not: the fold carries one column onto the next by a turn of two hundred and forty degrees, so the folded state repeats every third column and not before. A pattern has two periods and only one of them has ever been written down.
The period nobody measured
Every repeating pattern in this collection has its drawn period recorded, because a drawing cannot be generated without one. Its folded period is recorded nowhere, and on one of the families measured the two differ by a factor of three — which means the number that has always been quoted is the wrong one for anything about the folded object.
The sheet draws in crooked
Every twist tessellation measured here has collapsed by a similarity: the folded sheet is the flat one scaled and turned, the same way in every direction. The patterns that exist on sheared and stretched tilings do not. Ten of the fifteen images fold by a map with two different principal factors, up to five and a third to one — and the prediction that said which ten, made from the weights the pattern writes on its edges, is wrong in both directions.
The plane the five points were in
Five corrugations measured at one setting each gave five points, and the space between them was left as an open question: forbidden, or merely unvisited. Every one of those patterns has a dial nobody turned. Turned, they trace curves — the accordion's is a line with integers on it, the square twist's is the diagonal and nothing else, and the Miura's turns round on itself, so a steeper slant stops buying a smaller sheet.
The direction that gets longer
A shrink factor below one is a direction in which the folded sheet is bigger than the flat one, and the leaf corrugation has one. The cause is not the taper and not the angle: a corrugation's folded extent across its own creases is a constant of the cell, the same number at two rows and at ten, so the cross factor is the sheet's height divided by a fixed length — a straight line through the origin that crosses one at a definite row count.
The folded strip lies at its own slant
The two directional factors read a folded state against the axes the pattern was drawn on, with its first panel held where it was drawn. A flat-folded Miura is not lying along those axes: it is a strip of fixed width laid at exactly its own slant to them, and the leaf corrugation's strip lies at exactly its zigzag. So the Miura's cross factor changes with the number of columns — 1.748 on four, 0.948 on ten, at one slant — and on the leaf, on every Miura with an odd number of columns and on the twists of three and six sides, it changes with which panel is held. Read without axes, both families compact least at 0.80 radians, not at the 1.05 the box on the axes reports.
Every panel holds a frame
A flat-folded pattern can be put down on any of its panels, and on some patterns the pair of shrink factors changes with the choice. Holding a panel does not move the paper so much as turn the frame it is measured in, by twice the alternating sum of the crease directions crossed to reach that panel — a number Kawasaki's condition makes independent of the route. So the frames are read off the crease pattern before anything is folded. A pattern with one frame gives one answer whatever its folded shape; the five-sided twist has five frames and five answers; and the four-column Miura agrees on every panel although its folded strip is not its own mirror image, because a box cannot tell a shape from its half-turn.
A sheet that turns with the twist
Holding a different panel of a folded twist can give a different pair of shrink factors: on a square sheet the three- and six-sided twists gave two pairs each and the five-sided twist five. Cut each twist from a regular sheet of its own number of sides and every panel gives the same pair. The reason is a count of rotations. A K-sided twist's panels hold its folded state in frames that are multiples of 180⁄K or 360⁄K degrees; a sheet that shares g of the twist's rotations makes the widths agree in every frame those rotations reach, with the half-turn a width cannot see thrown in. On twenty-two pairs of twist and regular sheet, that count gives the exact number of answers every time — a hexagon twist on a triangle gives one, a pentagon twist on a square five.
A dial can turn the fold over
A twist tessellation drawn on a sheared square grid folds to a sheet that draws in 4.4 times as much one way as the other, and the obvious guess is that the number belongs to the tiling and the shear. It does not: the turn and the pleat angle move it from 1.5 to 383. Between pleat angles of −0.348 and −0.161 the collapse's area changes sign, and the twists fold to a mirror image of their own arrangement.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Folded stateTessellationFootprintMeasurementTwistPeriodicitySymmetryTilingAnisotropyThe folded periodGluingMiura