Origami & Folding
what one sheet can do
Concept

Attribution — where it appears

Assigning a result or a pattern to whoever produced it. The record's names and its dates disagree routinely, and the gap between the two is a fact about publishing rather than about discovery.

Named by 11 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

the alternating-angle conditionHusimi, 1979Kawasaki, 198910 yrmountains minus valleys is twoHusimi and Maekawa, 1979Justin, 19867 yrthe big-little-big lemmaJustin, 1986the lemma, 19948 yrone fold solves a cubicBeloch, 1936Huzita, 199155 yrthe diamond buckling patternYoshimura, 1951Yoshimura, 196918 yrthe bi-directional foldMiura, 1970Miura-ori, 199525 yr1940196019802000mean lag 21 years · longest 55proof

The name is not the date

Kawasaki's theorem is in Husimi's book ten years before Kawasaki's paper. Maekawa's is Justin's too. The mean gap between a result in this field and the name it is known by is twenty-two years, and it runs in one direction.

history · Attribution the cubic8x³ + 4x² − 4x − 1its roots-0.900969-0.2225210.6234903 real common tangentsone fold for each rootand the fold gives cos 2π/7each curve is the set of folds that puts one point on its line; a line touching both does the two at oncea compass intersects circles and gets two answers; a fold touches parabolas and gets up to three

Fifty years in the wrong language

Margherita Beloch showed in 1936 that one fold solves a general cubic. The result was correct, published, and in a mathematics journal — and the subject that needed it did not find it until 1991. The cost of a paper nobody reads is measurable, and it is most of a century.

history · Attribution what the construction produced23 twists, 122 interior verticesturned 24.1° from the tiling's edgespleats 0.068 to 0.068 wide1.58× smaller once the pleats are taken upevery vertex passes all four conditionsmountainvalleyraw edge

Where two twists share a pleat

Every twist tessellation the tradition draws has one size of twist, because every tiling it is drawn on has one kind of vertex. Hand the construction a tiling with two, and the pleat between a large twist and a small one turns out to fix their sizes exactly — three to one, and nothing else folds.

tessellation · Resch patternclassdatedfoldingThe preliminary basetraditional—724 mmThe Miura foldpublished as mathematics19701049 mmThe square twistgenerated here—704 mmThe hexagon twistgenerated here—916 mmThe Yoshimura patternpublished as mathematics19552380 mmFold and cut — the trianglegenerated here—258 mmThe tapered corrugationgenerated here—1057 mmThe waterbomb tessellationtraditional—2290 mm2 dated, all of them published; 6 undated, none of them ownedthe fourth class — a designer's model — is what this shelf holds none of

The patterns nobody owns

This site prints crease patterns at true scale and prints no designer's work, and that has always been stated as a rule applied at the end. Read the printed shelf as a documentary record instead and the rule turns out to be a property of the record: every pattern that carries a date was published as mathematics, every undated one belongs to nobody, and the two silences are one silence.

history · Attribution what is recorded, against what is left to the folderThe preliminary base8 panels · 15 bits of orderThe Miura fold24 panels · 79 bits of orderThe square twist9 panels · 18 bits of orderThe hexagon twist13 panels · 33 bits of orderThe Yoshimura pattern65 panels · 302 bits of orderFold and cut — the triangle7 panels · 12 bits of orderThe tapered corrugation28 panels · 98 bits of orderThe waterbomb tessellation52 panels · 226 bits of orderthe pattern, as every format records itthe order of the panels, which none of them does

The half no notation records

Every notation this subject has invented writes down the crease pattern or the sequence of folds, and the crease pattern is the half that does not decide the folded object. The field's interchange format has a place for the other half and nothing fills it in — including the files published here, which carry every vertex, edge and letter of a Yoshimura and none of the three hundred bits that would say which of its layer orders the folded object is.

history · Notation each mark is one claim: right of the line means dated earlier than its evidencethe vertical line is agreement between the claim and the record0paper itselfwhen and where the material was made, which is archaeologymedian 0 · spread 204a thing people dida fold, a ceremony, a toy, a lesson — something with no first daymedian 347 · spread 979a thing somebody proved or designeda statement with a paper, a date and an authormedian -14 · spread 131

Two kinds of claim

This site has published a median overrun of two centuries and a mean of twenty-two years in the opposite direction, and both are right. Split the record by what each claim is about and the reason appears: every claim about a practice is dated earlier than its evidence, most claims about a result are dated later, and the two scatter by 979 years and 131.

history · Attribution what is recorded, against what is left to the folderThe preliminary base8 panels · 15 bits of orderThe Miura fold24 panels · 79 bits of orderThe square twist9 panels · 18 bits of orderThe hexagon twist13 panels · 33 bits of orderThe Yoshimura pattern65 panels · 302 bits of orderFold and cut — the triangle7 panels · 12 bits of orderThe tapered corrugation28 panels · 98 bits of orderThe waterbomb tessellation52 panels · 226 bits of orderthe pattern, as every format records itthe order of the panels, which none of them does

The file records no verdict

A crease pattern file records vertices, edges and letters. Every one of the square twist's two hundred and fifty-six admissible letterings makes a perfectly valid file, and two hundred and forty-eight of them describe an object that does not exist. The format has a field for the layer order — the one thing that would settle it — and nothing fills it in, so a file is a drawing rather than a claim, and the field exchanges them as though they were claims.

history · Notation the bar is what the whole job costs if every attempt is stopped thereon the rhombille patch, read off 120 measured runsstop at 10051219% of runs finish by thenstop at 20053033% of runs finish by thenstop at 500105435% of runs finish by thenstop at 1000162442% of runs finish by thenstop at 2000263847% of runs finish by thenstop at 5000569749% of runs finish by thenstop at 100001060450% of runs finish by thenstop at 200001629160% of runs finish by thena run that never finished counts as above every cutoff, so the tail is read conservatively

The tail was named somewhere else

The search for a mountain-valley labelling of a tessellation patch costs eighty-four steps at best and does not finish at all two runs in five, and the cure is to stop and start again rather than to wait. None of that was discovered here. The distribution was described in the study of satisfiability solvers in the nineteen-nineties, the restart arithmetic is older still, and what a crease pattern contributes is one more instance.

history · Rediscovery Paper is made in ChinaPaper reaches JapanPaper is made in EuropeFolded paper is used ceremonially in Japan400 yrPaper is folded for amusement in Japan980 yrThe thousand cranes897 yrThe pajarita is folded in Spain293 yrPaper folding is taught as geometryOne fold solves a cubicThe diamond pattern in a crushed cylinderThe conditions at a flat-foldable vertexThe dashed-and-dotted diagram notationThe Miura foldA five-pointed star from one straight cutAny straight-line drawing, from one straight cutyear of the source500100015002000the date generally giventhe oldest source that says somedian overrun 201.5 years

The cure was named first

A heavy-tailed search runtime, the arithmetic for cutting it off and restarting, and the reason restarts work at all were established in the study of search between 1993 and 1998. This collection imported all three, and inherited with them the phenomenon they answer — which is that randomising a search's choices is what makes the tail.

history · Rediscovery 3 creases on a Möbius bandthe panels take two coloursseamthe same seam123the right edge onto the left, turned over3 creases, 3 panelsinterior vertices: 0two-coloursthe reflections closeand turn the paper the right waymountainvalleyraw edge

Found by people not folding paper

The shortest strip that makes a Möbius band has a literature, and it is in differential geometry rather than in origami. The two subjects have the same number, they reached it by completely different routes, and neither of them cites the other — which is the fourth time this collection has found that shape.

history · Rediscovery a disc, with a vertexa ring, with noneone interior vertex, 3 creases at itodd degree, so they do notno interior vertices at alland the panels still do notboth refuse: two routes round the sheet leave a panel 1.87 sheet-widths apart

A theorem with an unstated hypothesis

Maekawa's and Kawasaki's conditions are quoted everywhere without saying which sheet they are about, and they do not need to be — they are conditions at a point and every point is the same. The two-colouring is quoted the same way and it is not a condition at a point, and the omission there is not harmless.

history · Attribution

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Documentary recordRediscoveryIndependent discoveryKawasaki's theoremProvenanceCrease patternFold formatGluingLayer orderingMaekawa's theoremNotationPriority

All concepts