Crease radius — where it appears
Named by 18 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Four things that are not true
Zero thickness, no stretch, creases that are lines, and perfect memory. Every theorem on this site rests on all four, every one of them is false, and the interesting engineering is exactly where each fails.
The crease has a radius
A fold does not go through a line. It goes round a small arc, and the arc uses more paper than the stack advances by — a fraction of a millimetre per crease, and several millimetres across a grid, which is why an ambitious tessellation comes out short.
How many times can it be halved
The folklore says seven, and the folklore is a statement about one sheet of paper. What actually binds is arithmetic: every halving doubles the layers and the paper spent at the closed end grows as the square of the layer count, so the length needed for twelve folds is nearly a kilometre.
Nothing in a body folds on a line
A crease in an organism is not a crease. It is a compliant region — a patch of thinner material that bends — and a region has a width. The width consumes surface in exact proportion to the number of folds, which puts a ceiling on how fine a pattern can usefully get.
Closer than a crease is wide
One fold from a bare square leaves nine marks, seventy-five millimetres apart. Two folds leave five hundred and sixty-five, the closest pair half a millimetre apart. Three folds — using one axiom of the seven — leave half a million, and ninety-four per cent of them have another mark within a fifth of a millimetre. What bounds a folder is not what the axioms reach; it is what the paper can tell apart.
How deep is a crossing
A crossing is a verdict with no middle: two creases either pass through one another or they do not, and the first makes a pattern unfoldable while the second leaves it untouched. Measured on the patches where they occur, the shallowest crossing runs 0.16 mm past the end of the crease it meets, on a sheet 150 mm across. Five of the forty-seven are under half a millimetre, which is thinner than the line a pencil draws.
Four materials, four optima
The convergence argument gets its pattern and stops there. A hinge has a radius, the radius takes a fixed length of surface out of every fold, and the fold count that gets the most packing out of a sheet is inversely proportional to it — so a leaf, a wing, a gut lining and a metal array agreeing on a corrugation still disagree by an order of magnitude about how many creases to put in one.
The number is the angle
Every packing ratio worked out so far is computed at a fold closed all the way, and a folded wing is not closed all the way. At zero thickness the ratio runs away as the fold shuts, so the size of a quoted number says how far the fold got and not what the pattern is — and the pattern contributes only an exponent, which makes the same quoted ratio mean two quite different angles depending on which geometry produced it.
The fold count sets the spring
A corrugation sweeps the same span at every fold count, and the count decides only how much room the zigzag needs while it does it — which was counted as a gain with nothing pushing back. Something does push back. Every hinge is a spring, a finer corrugation has proportionally more of them, and the force to hold a given span rises exactly as the clearance falls: the product of the two is the same number whatever the count, and at each material's own best count the spring goes as one over the square of the hinge radius.
How far open is a question about the grip
A corrugation of hinges that rest flat is loaded when it is shut, so it opens by itself and the force in the held-state calculation is a restraint rather than a drive. Followed from shut to flat that restraint only ever falls, and by exactly π over two — so every partly open state a structure can occupy is squeezed into a band a third wide, and a grip that weakens by a third leaves the sheet nine tenths open.
Springs that disagree do not offer a choice
A corrugation of hinges that remember different angles was expected to have more than one position in which nothing pushes. It has exactly one, at the stiffness-weighted mean of what they remember, because a sum of parabolas in one variable is a parabola. The second resting place comes from somewhere else entirely — the mirror pattern — and the flat sheet is the barrier between them, which is also why a creased sheet cannot be pulled flat at all.
What a second deployment costs
Every folded structure this field builds deploys once. The reason is a power law: a hinge asked to survive more cycles cannot be as sharp, a blunter hinge takes more surface out of the sheet, and the fold count that packs best falls as the cycle count to a fatigue exponent. A structure required to work a thousand times packs thirty times worse than one required to work once, and the exponent decides how fast rather than whether.
The crease count is a reliability budget
A deployment that needs every hinge to work is the hinge reliability raised to the crease count, so the fineness that buys compaction spends the probability of getting it. At a thousandth of a chance of a hinge failing, sixty hinges give a 94 per cent deployment and three hundred give 74. The fold count that maximises expected compaction is well below the one that maximises compaction — and demonstrating the result takes tens of thousands of successful tests on an article that itself deploys once.
The paper that will not hold a crease
Every constraint these essays have found improves as the paper gets thinner: the stack, the size, the layer count. A crease does not. A crease is a plastic hinge in the fibres at the fold, and a sheet one fibre thick has nothing through its thickness to hinge — so there is a floor under the thickness that no manufacturing skill moves, because the fibre diameter is a constant of the plant. The papers a tradition folds sit between one and a half fibres and four, and the two below that in this collection's own shelf are tissues, which are backed with foil before anybody creases them.
The density a paper allows
Every density these essays measure is a quotient a pattern hands over, and nothing has asked what the paper's own answer is. It has one: a crease occupies a band a few thicknesses across, so two creases closer than that are not two creases, and a sheet of a given thickness carries a largest density. Copier paper allows 1,667 metres of crease a square metre and the densest pattern on the printed shelf asks for 89 — a factor of nineteen below the worst paper's ceiling. The material is not what limits a crease pattern's density at any fineness anybody folds.
A paper limits spacing, not density
The density ceiling put a sheet's limit at parallel creases a crease-width apart, 1⁄w of crease a square metre, and claimed no arrangement carries more. Crossing families do: they meet at vertices, which is shared ground, and never come closer than w anywhere else. Measured over every pair of creases that do not share a vertex, density times closest spacing settles at about 1.9 for both the Miura and the waterbomb, so each can be folded nearly twice as fine as the density bound said — 262 cells a side on copier paper for the Miura rather than 139, and 141 for the waterbomb rather than 74.
A vertex creases the paper twice
Two creases that meet share ground near the point, and their bands overlap out along each of them to w⁄sin θ for a sector angle θ below a right angle. Add the overlap at both ends of a crease, and a crease no longer than that is overlap from end to end — a crease only in the drawing. That third bound binds before the spacing does: the finest Miura on copier paper is 135 cells a side by its vertices against 262 by its spacing, and the finest waterbomb 82 against 141. Both land within a tenth of the density bound, which had the wrong argument and nearly the right number.
Holding a fold moves the force
A creased hinge held at an angle slowly comes to remember that angle, so a leaf or a wing packed in a bud for a season is gradually holding itself and the bud has less to do. The force is not used up in the process. The torque the container must supply falls as e^(−T⁄τ), the torque later needed to open the structure rises by exactly the same amount, and the two sum to the same total at every moment of the holding. Held for three relaxation times, a corrugation creased to 0.8 radians and packed to 2.4 needs 4 per cent of the total from its container and 96 per cent from whatever opens it — and the barrier to its mirror image has grown more than eightfold. A packing that lasts buys independence from its container with a harder unfolding.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
IdealisationCorrugationThicknessTrade-offConvergenceMembrane hingePacking ratioDeploymentError propagationCrease lengthEnergy minimisationInsect wings